↓ Skip to main content

Ongoing geographical spread of Tomato yellow leaf curl virus

Overview of attention for article published in Virology, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ongoing geographical spread of Tomato yellow leaf curl virus
Published in
Virology, September 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.virol.2016.08.033
Pubmed ID
Authors

Batsirai Mabvakure, Darren P. Martin, Simona Kraberger, Leendert Cloete, Sharon van Brunschot, Andrew D.W. Geering, John E. Thomas, Kaveh Bananej, Jean-Michel Lett, Pierre Lefeuvre, Arvind Varsani, Gordon W. Harkins

Abstract

Tomato yellow leaf curl virus (TYLCV) seriously impacts tomato production throughout tropical and sub-tropical regions of the world. It has a broad geographical distribution and continues to spread to new regions in the Indian and Pacific Oceans including Australia, New Caledonia and Mauritius. We undertook a temporally-scaled, phylogeographic analysis of all publicly available, full genome sequences of TYLCV, together with 70 new genome sequences from Australia, Iran and Mauritius. This revealed that whereas epidemics in Australia and China likely originated through multiple independent viral introductions from the East-Asian region around Japan and Korea, the New Caledonian epidemic was seeded by a variant from the Western Mediterranean region and the Mauritian epidemic by a variant from the neighbouring island of Reunion. Finally, we show that inter-continental scale movements of TYLCV to East Asia have, at least temporarily, ceased, whereas long-distance movements to the Americas and Australia are probably still ongoing.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 109 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 15%
Student > Bachelor 13 12%
Researcher 10 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 27 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 46%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 3%
Computer Science 3 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 28 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2016.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Virology
#8,235
of 9,498 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#213,870
of 329,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Virology
#46
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,498 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,606 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.