↓ Skip to main content

Distinct bilineal leukemia immunophenotypes are not genetically determined

Overview of attention for article published in Blood, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Distinct bilineal leukemia immunophenotypes are not genetically determined
Published in
Blood, September 2016
DOI 10.1182/blood-2016-07-725861
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michaela Kotrova, Alena Musilova, Jan Stuchly, Karel Fiser, Julia Starkova, Ester Mejstrikova, Jan Stary, Jan Zuna, Ondrej Hrusak, Jan Trka, Marketa Zaliova

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 3%
Czechia 1 3%
Unknown 28 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 27%
Researcher 7 23%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 3 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 47%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 4 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2018.
All research outputs
#4,832,189
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Blood
#7,026
of 33,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,524
of 330,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Blood
#94
of 261 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,901 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 261 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.