↓ Skip to main content

Current status in cancer cell reprogramming and its clinical implications

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
Title
Current status in cancer cell reprogramming and its clinical implications
Published in
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, September 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00432-016-2258-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kenan Izgi, Halit Canatan, Banu Iskender

Abstract

The technology of reprogramming a terminally differentiated cell to an embryonic-like state uncovered the possibility of reprogramming a malignant cell back to a more manageable stem cell-like state. Since the current cancer models suffer from reflecting heterogeneous tumour structure and limited to express the late-stage markers, the induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) technology could provide an alternative model to recapitulate the early stages of cancer. Generation of iPSCs from cancer cells could offer a tool for understanding the mechanisms of tumour initiation-progression in vitro, a platform for studying tumour heterogeneity and origin of cancer stem cells and a source for cancer type-specific drug discovery studies. In this review, we discussed the recent findings in reprogramming cancer cells with a special emphasis on similarities between cancer cells and pluripotent cells. We presented the basis of challenges in cancer cell reprogramming including the current problems in reprogramming, cancer-specific epigenetic state and chromosomal aberrations. Cancer epigenetics represent the major hurdle before the prospective use of cancer iPSCs as a model system and for biomarker research. When the reprogramming process is optimised for cancer cell types, it might serve for two purposes: identification of the specific epigenetic state of cancer as well as reversion of the malignant phenotype to a potentially malignant but manageable state. Reprogramming cancer cells would serve for our understanding of cancer-specific epigenome and elucidation of overlapping mechanisms shared by cancer-initiating cells and pluripotent cells.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
France 1 2%
Unknown 41 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 26%
Researcher 11 26%
Student > Master 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 1 2%
Professor 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 11 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Physics and Astronomy 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 12 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2016.
All research outputs
#3,772,317
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
#173
of 2,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,952
of 324,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
#2
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,632 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,830 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.