↓ Skip to main content

Genetic Susceptibility in IBD

Overview of attention for article published in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genetic Susceptibility in IBD
Published in
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, February 2013
DOI 10.1097/mib.0b013e3182810041
Pubmed ID
Authors

James D. Doecke, Lisa A. Simms, Zhen Zhen Zhao, Ning Huang, Katherine Hanigan, Krupa Krishnaprasad, Rebecca L. Roberts, Jane M. Andrews, Gillian Mahy, Peter Bampton, Peter Lewindon, Timothy Florin, Ian C. Lawrance, Richard B. Gearry, Grant W. Montgomery, Graham L. Radford-Smith

Abstract

The etiology of ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) involves both genetic and environmental components. Multiple UC and CD susceptibility genes have been identified through genome-wide association studies and subsequent meta-analyses. These studies have also highlighted the presence of genes common to both diseases, and shared with several other autoimmune disorders. The aim of this study was to identify single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) recently identified by the International IBD Genetics Consortium (IIBDGC) demonstrating that highly significant associations with CD could also confer genetic susceptibility to UC.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hong Kong 1 3%
Unknown 34 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 31%
Researcher 8 23%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Student > Master 2 6%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 5 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Computer Science 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 5 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2013.
All research outputs
#6,228,723
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
#1,196
of 3,730 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,073
of 291,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
#10
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,730 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,204 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.