| Title |
Potential Impact of USPSTF Recommendations on Early Diagnosis of Breast Cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Surgical Oncology, September 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1245/s10434-011-1915-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Robert Aragon, John Morgan, Jan H. Wong, Sharon Lum |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Ukraine | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 40 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 20% |
| Researcher | 7 | 16% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 16% |
| Unknown | 11 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 39% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 7% |
| Psychology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 13 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2019.
All research outputs
#4,720,129
of 22,888,307 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#1,557
of 6,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,766
of 131,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#7
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,888,307 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,492 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 131,957 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.