↓ Skip to main content

How do we select multiple features? Transient costs for selecting two colors rather than one, persistent costs for color–location conjunctions

Overview of attention for article published in Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
How do we select multiple features? Transient costs for selecting two colors rather than one, persistent costs for color–location conjunctions
Published in
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, November 2013
DOI 10.3758/s13414-013-0573-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shih-Yu Lo, Alex O. Holcombe

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Australia 1 3%
Unknown 30 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 19%
Student > Bachelor 5 16%
Student > Master 4 13%
Other 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 4 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 20 63%
Linguistics 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 4 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2016.
All research outputs
#16,287,458
of 24,003,070 outputs
Outputs from Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
#848
of 1,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196,667
of 310,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
#25
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,003,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,773 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,208 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.