| Title |
Midsession reversals with pigeons: visual versus spatial discriminations and the intertrial interval
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Learning & Behavior, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.3758/s13420-013-0122-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jennifer R. Laude, Jessica P. Stagner, Rebecca Rayburn-Reeves, Thomas R. Zentall |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Austria | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 24 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 31% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 19% |
| Researcher | 4 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 12% |
| Unknown | 3 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 13 | 50% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 19% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 2 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2016.
All research outputs
#17,286,379
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Learning & Behavior
#404
of 904 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,408
of 213,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Learning & Behavior
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 904 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,537 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.