↓ Skip to main content

Ice-albedo feedback in a CO2-doubling simulation

Overview of attention for article published in Climatic Change, July 1987
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Ice-albedo feedback in a CO2-doubling simulation
Published in
Climatic Change, July 1987
DOI 10.1007/bf00143904
Authors

Robert E. Dickinson, Gerald A. Meehl, Warren M. Washington

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 5%
Canada 1 5%
Unknown 18 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 35%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Researcher 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Other 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 45%
Environmental Science 2 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Chemistry 1 5%
Materials Science 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2016.
All research outputs
#2,220,217
of 22,888,307 outputs
Outputs from Climatic Change
#1,635
of 5,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#309
of 12,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climatic Change
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,888,307 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,814 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 12,028 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them