↓ Skip to main content

Nautilus at Risk – Estimating Population Size and Demography of Nautilus pompilius

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nautilus at Risk – Estimating Population Size and Demography of Nautilus pompilius
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0016716
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew Dunstan, Corey J. A. Bradshaw, Justin Marshall

Abstract

The low fecundity, late maturity, long gestation and long life span of Nautilus suggest that this species is vulnerable to over-exploitation. Demand from the ornamental shell trade has contributed to their rapid decline in localized populations. More data from wild populations are needed to design management plans which ensure Nautilus persistence. We used a variety of techniques including capture-mark-recapture, baited remote underwater video systems, ultrasonic telemetry and remotely operated vehicles to estimate population size, growth rates, distribution and demographic characteristics of an unexploited Nautilus pompilius population at Osprey Reef (Coral Sea, Australia). We estimated a small and dispersed population of between 844 and 4467 individuals (14.6-77.4 km(-2)) dominated by males (83:17 male:female) and comprised of few juveniles (<10%).These results provide the first Nautilid population and density estimates which are essential elements for long-term management of populations via sustainable catch models. Results from baited remote underwater video systems provide confidence for their more widespread use to assess efficiently the size and density of exploited and unexploited Nautilus populations worldwide.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
France 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Unknown 75 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 18%
Other 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Student > Master 8 10%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 11 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 43 52%
Environmental Science 15 18%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 11 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,829,850
of 23,838,611 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#23,078
of 203,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,442
of 188,648 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#175
of 1,277 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,838,611 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 203,659 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,648 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,277 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.