↓ Skip to main content

Psychological Distress and Enrollment in Medicaid

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Psychological Distress and Enrollment in Medicaid
Published in
The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, September 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11414-016-9532-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gilbert Gonzales, Ezra Golberstein, Steven C. Hill, Samuel H. Zuvekas

Abstract

Adults with poor mental health may want and need insurance to obtain care, but symptoms may impede enrollment into public health insurance. This study compares Medicaid enrollment responses to eligibility expansions by mental health status using a sample of non-elderly adults in both the 2000-2011 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey and the National Health Interview Survey (N = 27,494). The impact of Medicaid income eligibility thresholds (defined as the maximum family income level allowed in each state to be considered eligible for Medicaid) on Medicaid enrollment was estimated from linear regression models allowing for differential enrollment responses by mental and physical health status. Increasing income eligibility thresholds by 100% of the federal poverty level (FPL) was associated with a five-percentage-point increase in the probability of Medicaid enrollment in the non-disabled population under 300% FPL. The enrollment response to Medicaid expansions prior to the Affordable Care Act was stronger for adults symptomatic of psychological distress compared with adults without distress and compared to adults with chronic physical health problems.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 23%
Student > Bachelor 4 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Professor 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 10 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 5 19%
Arts and Humanities 2 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Mathematics 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 13 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2016.
All research outputs
#14,546,919
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research
#326
of 469 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,541
of 326,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 469 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,036 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.