| Title |
Acculturation of Attitudes Toward End‐of‐life Care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, July 2002
|
| DOI | 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.10734.x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shinji Matsumura, Seiji Bito, Honghu Liu, Katharine Kahn, Shunichi Fukuhara, Marjorie Kagawa‐Singer, Neil Wenger |
| Abstract |
Cross-cultural ethical conflicts are common. However, little is known about how and to what extent acculturation changes attitudes toward end-of-life care and advance care planning. We compared attitudes toward end-of-life care among Japanese Americans and Japanese in Japan. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 49 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 13% |
| Researcher | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 11% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 11 | 21% |
| Unknown | 13 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 34% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 8% |
| Psychology | 4 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 15 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2013.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#6,327
of 8,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,296
of 47,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#16
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,173 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 47,739 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.