You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Efficacy of the Herpes Zoster Subunit Vaccine in Adults 70 Years of Age or Older
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
New England Journal of Medicine, September 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1056/nejmoa1603800 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anthony L Cunningham, Himal Lal, Martina Kovac, Roman Chlibek, Shinn-Jang Hwang, Javier Díez-Domingo, Olivier Godeaux, Myron J Levin, Janet E McElhaney, Joan Puig-Barberà, Carline Vanden Abeele, Timo Vesikari, Daisuke Watanabe, Toufik Zahaf, Anitta Ahonen, Eugene Athan, Jose F Barba-Gomez, Laura Campora, Ferdinandus de Looze, H Jackson Downey, Wayne Ghesquiere, Iris Gorfinkel, Tiina Korhonen, Edward Leung, Shelly A McNeil, Lidia Oostvogels, Lars Rombo, Jan Smetana, Lily Weckx, Wilfred Yeo, Thomas C Heineman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 251 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 52 | 21% |
| Canada | 23 | 9% |
| Japan | 14 | 6% |
| Spain | 12 | 5% |
| Australia | 8 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 3% |
| Colombia | 3 | 1% |
| Ecuador | 2 | <1% |
| Chile | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 21 | 8% |
| Unknown | 107 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 173 | 69% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 36 | 14% |
| Scientists | 35 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 514 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 512 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 68 | 13% |
| Other | 52 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 48 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 45 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 38 | 7% |
| Other | 120 | 23% |
| Unknown | 143 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 178 | 35% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 33 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 32 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 28 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 4% |
| Other | 54 | 11% |
| Unknown | 168 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 768. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2024.
All research outputs
#25,921
of 25,830,005 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#1,052
of 32,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#419
of 330,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#28
of 314 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,830,005 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,698 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 122.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,968 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 314 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.