↓ Skip to main content

Successful application of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy to establish pancreatic patient-derived tumor xenografts: a pilot study

Overview of attention for article published in Endoscopy, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Successful application of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy to establish pancreatic patient-derived tumor xenografts: a pilot study
Published in
Endoscopy, September 2016
DOI 10.1055/s-0042-113597
Pubmed ID
Authors

Els Hermans, Schalk W Van der Merwe, Jeroen Depreeuw, Jeroen Dekervel, Enrico Radaelli, Tania Roskams, Jos van Pelt Jos, Baki Topal, Chris Verslype, Hans Prenen, Werner Van Steenbergen, Frederik Nevens, Diether Lambrechts, Frédéric Amant

Abstract

Background and study aim: Typically, pancreatic patient-derived tumor xenografts (PDXs) are established by transplanting large tumor biopsies obtained through invasive surgery approaches into immunocompromised mice. We aimed to develop pancreatic PDXs by transplanting tumor tissue acquired by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle biopsies (FNB), assess take rates compared to surgery-derived PDXs, and demonstrate the histological and genetic resemblance to the original tumor. Patients and methods: Biopsies of untreated pancreatic carcinoma were collected at surgery and during EUS and processed to generate PDXs. Results: By centrifugation of FNB-derived tissue prior to engraftment, we achieved an engraftment rate of 60 % (6/10). Despite a decrease in stromal tissue, the general morphology of FNB-derived PDXs was conserved as assessed by histopathology. At the genetic level, somatic mutation and copy number profiles were largely similar to the primary tumor. Conclusion: We show that it is technically feasible to establish pancreatic PDXs using a minimally invasive sampling technique, such as EUS-FNB. Although only a limited amount of tumor tissue was acquired, we obtained results similar to those from surgery-derived PDXs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 19%
Professor 3 19%
Librarian 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 5 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 69%
Arts and Humanities 1 6%
Unknown 4 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2016.
All research outputs
#14,861,191
of 22,888,307 outputs
Outputs from Endoscopy
#1,537
of 2,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,665
of 321,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Endoscopy
#15
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,888,307 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,782 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,980 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.