↓ Skip to main content

NF-κB Pathways in the Pathogenesis of Multiple Sclerosis and the Therapeutic Implications

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
NF-κB Pathways in the Pathogenesis of Multiple Sclerosis and the Therapeutic Implications
Published in
Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, September 2016
DOI 10.3389/fnmol.2016.00084
Pubmed ID
Authors

Saskia M. Leibowitz, Jun Yan

Abstract

Nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB) signaling pathways are involved in cell immune responses, apoptosis and infections. In multiple sclerosis (MS), NF-κB pathways are changed, leading to increased levels of NF-κB activation in cells. This may indicate a key role for NF-κB in MS pathogenesis. NF-κB signaling is complex, with many elements involved in its activation and regulation. Interestingly, current MS treatments are found to be directly or indirectly linked to NF-κB pathways and act to adjust the innate and adaptive immune system in patients. In this review, we will first focus on the intricacies of NF-κB signaling, including the activating pathways and regulatory elements. Next, we will theorize about the role of NF-κB in MS pathogenesis, based on current research findings, and discuss some of the associated therapeutic implications. Lastly, we will review four new MS treatments which interrupt NF-κB pathways-fingolimod, teriflunomide, dimethyl fumarate (DMF) and laquinimod (LAQ)-and explain their mechanisms, and the possible strategy for MS treatments in the future.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 97 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 13%
Student > Master 12 12%
Student > Bachelor 12 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 25 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 16%
Neuroscience 16 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 4%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 30 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2016.
All research outputs
#18,471,305
of 22,888,307 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#2,280
of 2,894 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#243,646
of 321,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#29
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,888,307 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,894 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,166 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.