You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Eliciting general practitioners' salient beliefs towards prescribing: A qualitative study based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour in Greece
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Clinical Pharmacy & Therapeutics, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1111/jcpt.12037 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
V. Tsiantou, S. Shea, L. Martinez, D. Agius, O. Basak, T. Faresjö, J. Moschandreas, G. Samoutis, E. K. Symvoulakis, C. Lionis |
| Abstract |
Prescribing represents an important medical action especially in primary care. However, irrational prescribing is common and has an impact on clinical and economic outcomes. Therefore, there is a growing need to rationalize prescribing. Knowledge of influential factors is crucial for achieving this. The aim of the present study was to identify the behavioural, normative and control beliefs of GPs regarding prescribing in Greece. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 72 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 16% |
| Researcher | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 19% |
| Unknown | 14 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 29% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 7% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 19% |
| Unknown | 16 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2013.
All research outputs
#20,674,485
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Pharmacy & Therapeutics
#1,278
of 1,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#228,835
of 289,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Pharmacy & Therapeutics
#17
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,638 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,703 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.