↓ Skip to main content

Orbital Identification of Carbonate-Bearing Rocks on Mars

Overview of attention for article published in Science, December 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
558 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
307 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Orbital Identification of Carbonate-Bearing Rocks on Mars
Published in
Science, December 2008
DOI 10.1126/science.1164759
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bethany L. Ehlmann, John F. Mustard, Scott L. Murchie, Francois Poulet, Janice L. Bishop, Adrian J. Brown, Wendy M. Calvin, Roger N. Clark, David J. Des Marais, Ralph E. Milliken, Leah H. Roach, Ted L. Roush, Gregg A. Swayze, James J. Wray

Abstract

Geochemical models for Mars predict carbonate formation during aqueous alteration. Carbonate-bearing rocks had not previously been detected on Mars' surface, but Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter mapping reveals a regional rock layer with near-infrared spectral characteristics that are consistent with the presence of magnesium carbonate in the Nili Fossae region. The carbonate is closely associated with both phyllosilicate-bearing and olivine-rich rock units and probably formed during the Noachian or early Hesperian era from the alteration of olivine by either hydrothermal fluids or near-surface water. The presence of carbonate as well as accompanying clays suggests that waters were neutral to alkaline at the time of its formation and that acidic weathering, proposed to be characteristic of Hesperian Mars, did not destroy these carbonates and thus did not dominate all aqueous environments.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 307 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 2%
Germany 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 292 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 76 25%
Researcher 70 23%
Student > Master 34 11%
Student > Bachelor 30 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 17 6%
Other 36 12%
Unknown 44 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 155 50%
Physics and Astronomy 39 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 5%
Engineering 11 4%
Chemistry 8 3%
Other 23 7%
Unknown 55 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2021.
All research outputs
#929,204
of 22,694,633 outputs
Outputs from Science
#17,649
of 77,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,316
of 167,371 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#56
of 337 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,694,633 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 77,825 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 62.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,371 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 337 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.