↓ Skip to main content

What Do Parents of Children with Down Syndrome Think about Non‐Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT)?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Genetic Counseling, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
3 policy sources
twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
158 Mendeley
Title
What Do Parents of Children with Down Syndrome Think about Non‐Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT)?
Published in
Journal of Genetic Counseling, September 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10897-016-0012-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rachèl V. van Schendel, Adriana Kater‐Kuipers, Elsbeth H. van Vliet‐Lachotzki, Wybo J. Dondorp, Martina C. Cornel, Lidewij Henneman

Abstract

This study explores the attitudes of parents of children with Down syndrome towards non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) and widening the scope of prenatal screening. Three focus groups (n = 16) and eleven individual interviews with Dutch parents (and two relatives) of children with Down syndrome were conducted. Safety, accuracy and earlier testing were seen as the advantages of NIPT. Some participants were critical about the practice of screening for Down syndrome, but acknowledged that NIPT enables people to know whether the fetus is affected and to prepare without risking miscarriage. Many feared uncritical use of NIPT and more abortions for Down syndrome. Concerns included the consequences for the acceptance of and facilities for children with Down syndrome, resulting in more people deciding to screen. Participants stressed the importance of good counseling and balanced, accurate information about Down syndrome. Testing for more disorders might divert the focus away from Down syndrome, but participants worried about "where to draw the line". They also feared a loss of diversity in society. Findings show that, while parents acknowledge that NIPT offers a better and safer option to know whether the fetus is affected, they also have concerns about NIPT's impact on the acceptance and care of children with Down syndrome.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Philippines 1 <1%
Unknown 157 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 35 22%
Student > Master 23 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 13%
Other 10 6%
Researcher 8 5%
Other 22 14%
Unknown 39 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 7%
Social Sciences 9 6%
Other 26 16%
Unknown 45 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2021.
All research outputs
#2,253,787
of 24,246,771 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Genetic Counseling
#81
of 1,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,459
of 327,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Genetic Counseling
#2
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,246,771 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,220 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,194 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.