↓ Skip to main content

Neural effects of short-term training on working memory

Overview of attention for article published in Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
180 Mendeley
Title
Neural effects of short-term training on working memory
Published in
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, February 2014
DOI 10.3758/s13415-013-0244-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin Buschkuehl, Luis Hernandez-Garcia, Susanne M. Jaeggi, Jessica A. Bernard, John Jonides

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 3%
Poland 2 1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 168 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 25%
Researcher 27 15%
Student > Master 23 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 10%
Student > Bachelor 16 9%
Other 31 17%
Unknown 20 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 83 46%
Neuroscience 25 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 6%
Social Sciences 10 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 18 10%
Unknown 29 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2016.
All research outputs
#16,287,458
of 24,003,070 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
#618
of 974 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197,106
of 315,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
#18
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,003,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 974 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,113 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.