↓ Skip to main content

Does centrifugation matter? Centrifugal force and spinning time alter the plasma metabolome

Overview of attention for article published in Metabolomics, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
Title
Does centrifugation matter? Centrifugal force and spinning time alter the plasma metabolome
Published in
Metabolomics, September 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11306-016-1109-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dorothea Lesche, Roland Geyer, Daniel Lienhard, Christos T. Nakas, Gaëlle Diserens, Peter Vermathen, Alexander B. Leichtle

Abstract

Centrifugation is an indispensable procedure for plasma sample preparation, but applied conditions can vary between labs. Determine whether routinely used plasma centrifugation protocols (1500×g 10 min; 3000×g 5 min) influence non-targeted metabolomic analyses. Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR) and High Resolution Mass Spectrometry (HRMS) data were evaluated with sparse partial least squares discriminant analyses and compared with cell count measurements. Besides significant differences in platelet count, we identified substantial alterations in NMR and HRMS data related to the different centrifugation protocols. Already minor differences in plasma centrifugation can significantly influence metabolomic patterns and potentially bias metabolomics studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Unknown 86 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 17%
Student > Bachelor 15 17%
Researcher 14 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 17 19%
Unknown 17 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 17%
Chemistry 12 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 4%
Other 15 17%
Unknown 21 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2017.
All research outputs
#3,623,366
of 23,301,510 outputs
Outputs from Metabolomics
#174
of 1,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,642
of 322,508 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Metabolomics
#6
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,301,510 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,309 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,508 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.