You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Theoretical Study of the Charge-Transfer State Separation within Marcus Theory: The C60-Anthracene Case Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, September 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1021/acsami.6b06645 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Riccardo Volpi, Racine Nassau, Morten Steen Nørby, Mathieu Linares |
| Abstract |
We study, within Marcus theory, the possibility of the charge-transfer (CT) state splitting at organic interfaces and a subsequent transport of the free charge carriers to the electrodes. As a case study we analyze model anthracene-C60 interfaces. Kinetic Monte Carlo (KMC) simulations on the ground CT state were performed at a range of applied electric fields, and with the fields applied at a range of angles to the interface to simulate the action of the electric field in a bulk heterojunction (BHJ) interface. The results show that the inclusion of polarization in our model increases CT state dissociation and charge collection. The effect of the electric field on CT state splitting and free charge carriers conduction is analyzed in details with and without polarization. Also, depending on the relative orientation of the anthracene and C60 molecules, CT state splitting shows different behavior with respect to both applied field strength and applied field angle. The importance of the hot CT in helping the charge carrier dissociation is also analyzed in our scheme. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 22 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 52% |
| Researcher | 5 | 22% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
| Librarian | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 1 | 4% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 8 | 35% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 7 | 30% |
| Materials Science | 4 | 17% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 4% |
| Engineering | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 2 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2016.
All research outputs
#18,471,305
of 22,888,307 outputs
Outputs from ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
#11,811
of 17,375 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#244,754
of 322,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
#249
of 380 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,888,307 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,375 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,308 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 380 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.