↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating perceptual integration: uniting response-time- and accuracy-based methodologies

Overview of attention for article published in Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Evaluating perceptual integration: uniting response-time- and accuracy-based methodologies
Published in
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, November 2014
DOI 10.3758/s13414-014-0788-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ami Eidels, James T. Townsend, Howard C. Hughes, Lacey A. Perry

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 5%
Unknown 20 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 29%
Professor 4 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 14%
Researcher 3 14%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 3 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 12 57%
Linguistics 2 10%
Mathematics 1 5%
Computer Science 1 5%
Engineering 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2016.
All research outputs
#16,287,458
of 24,003,070 outputs
Outputs from Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
#848
of 1,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,991
of 266,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
#26
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,003,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,773 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,027 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.