↓ Skip to main content

Can we prevent or treat multiple sclerosis by individualised vitamin D supply?

Overview of attention for article published in EPMA Journal, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Can we prevent or treat multiple sclerosis by individualised vitamin D supply?
Published in
EPMA Journal, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1878-5085-4-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jan Dörr, Andrea Döring, Friedemann Paul

Abstract

Apart from its principal role in bone metabolism and calcium homeostasis, vitamin D has been attributed additional effects including an immunomodulatory, anti-inflammatory, and possibly even neuroprotective capacity which implicates a possible role of vitamin D in autoimmune diseases like multiple sclerosis (MS). Indeed, several lines of evidence including epidemiologic, preclinical, and clinical data suggest that reduced vitamin D levels and/or dysregulation of vitamin D homeostasis is a risk factor for the development of multiple sclerosis on the one hand, and that vitamin D serum levels are inversely associated with disease activity and progression on the other hand. However, these data are not undisputable, and many questions regarding the preventive and therapeutic capacity of vitamin D in multiple sclerosis remain to be answered. In particular, available clinical data derived from interventional trials using vitamin D supplementation as a therapeutic approach in MS are inconclusive and partly contradictory. In this review, we summarise and critically evaluate the existing data on the possible link between vitamin D and multiple sclerosis in light of the crucial question whether optimization of vitamin D status may impact the risk and/or the course of multiple sclerosis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Brazil 2 2%
Hungary 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 107 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 24 21%
Student > Master 14 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 11%
Researcher 10 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 23 20%
Unknown 23 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 23%
Neuroscience 8 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 26 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2016.
All research outputs
#6,304,362
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from EPMA Journal
#85
of 333 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,434
of 292,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EPMA Journal
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 333 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,109 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.