↓ Skip to main content

Influence of light and nitrogen on the photosynthetic efficiency in the C4 plant Miscanthus × giganteus

Overview of attention for article published in Photosynthesis Research, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
Title
Influence of light and nitrogen on the photosynthetic efficiency in the C4 plant Miscanthus × giganteus
Published in
Photosynthesis Research, August 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11120-016-0281-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jian-Ying Ma, Wei Sun, Nuria K. Koteyeva, Elena Voznesenskaya, Samantha S. Stutz, Anthony Gandin, Andreia M. Smith-Moritz, Joshua L. Heazlewood, Asaph B. Cousins

Abstract

There are numerous studies describing how growth conditions influence the efficiency of C4 photosynthesis. However, it remains unclear how changes in the biochemical capacity versus leaf anatomy drives this acclimation. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine how growth light and nitrogen availability influence leaf anatomy, biochemistry and the efficiency of the CO2 concentrating mechanism in Miscanthus × giganteus. There was an increase in the mesophyll cell wall surface area but not cell well thickness in the high-light (HL) compared to the low-light (LL) grown plants suggesting a higher mesophyll conductance in the HL plants, which also had greater photosynthetic capacity. Additionally, the HL plants had greater surface area and thickness of bundle-sheath cell walls compared to LL plants, suggesting limited differences in bundle-sheath CO2 conductance because the increased area was offset by thicker cell walls. The gas exchange estimates of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (PEPc) activity were significantly less than the in vitro PEPc activity, suggesting limited substrate availability in the leaf due to low mesophyll CO2 conductance. Finally, leakiness was similar across all growth conditions and generally did not change under the different measurement light conditions. However, differences in the stable isotope composition of leaf material did not correlate with leakiness indicating that dry matter isotope measurements are not a good proxy for leakiness. Taken together, these data suggest that the CO2 concentrating mechanism in Miscanthus is robust under low-light and limited nitrogen growth conditions, and that the observed changes in leaf anatomy and biochemistry likely help to maintain this efficiency.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 22%
Researcher 8 15%
Student > Master 8 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 13 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 46%
Engineering 4 7%
Environmental Science 3 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 15 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2016.
All research outputs
#17,816,222
of 22,888,307 outputs
Outputs from Photosynthesis Research
#603
of 770 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#227,211
of 313,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Photosynthesis Research
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,888,307 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 770 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,447 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.