You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Can satellite-based night lights be used for conservation? The case of nesting sea turtles in the Mediterranean
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Conservation, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.11.004 |
| Authors |
Tessa Mazor, Noam Levin, Hugh P. Possingham, Yaniv Levy, Duccio Rocchini, Anthony J. Richardson, Salit Kark |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| Australia | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 221 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 211 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 40 | 18% |
| Researcher | 35 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 12% |
| Other | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 34 | 15% |
| Unknown | 39 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 90 | 41% |
| Environmental Science | 62 | 28% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 9 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 1% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 9 | 4% |
| Unknown | 45 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2022.
All research outputs
#2,231,303
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#1,768
of 6,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,738
of 206,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#26
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,612 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,319 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.