↓ Skip to main content

Collagen based barrier membranes for periodontal guided bone regeneration applications

Overview of attention for article published in Odontology, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
133 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
275 Mendeley
Title
Collagen based barrier membranes for periodontal guided bone regeneration applications
Published in
Odontology, September 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10266-016-0267-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zeeshan Sheikh, Javairia Qureshi, Abdullah M. Alshahrani, Heba Nassar, Yuichi Ikeda, Michael Glogauer, Bernhard Ganss

Abstract

Certain cell populations within periodontal tissues possess the ability to induce regeneration, provided they have the opportunity to populate the wound or defect. Guided regeneration techniques have been investigated for regenerating periodontal tissues and such therapies usually utilize barrier membranes. Various natural and synthetic barrier membranes have been fabricated and tested to prevent epithelial and connective tissue cells from invading while allowing periodontal cells to selectively migrate into the defect. This paper focuses on the literature relevant to the use and potential of resorbable collagen membranes in GBR procedures, sites of periodontal and intrabony defects, in cases of socket and alveolar ridge preservation and at implant sites. The results of their use in GBR procedures has shown them to be effective and comparable with non-resorbable membranes with regards to clinical attachment gain, probing depth reduction and defect bone filling. They have also shown to prevent epithelial ingrowth into the defect space during the initial wound healing phase postsurgically. Collagen membranes have also been used for root coverage and GBR procedures and have shown good success rates comparable to subepithelial connective tissue grafts and expanded-polytetrafluoroethylene (e-PTFE) membranes. The future for periodontal tissue engineering is very exciting with the use of barrier membranes expected to continue playing a critical role. However, long-term clinical trials are required to further evaluate and confirm the efficacy of the available collagen barrier membranes for periodontal and bone regeneration use.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 275 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 275 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 41 15%
Student > Bachelor 27 10%
Student > Postgraduate 26 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 7%
Other 37 13%
Unknown 98 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 93 34%
Materials Science 18 7%
Engineering 12 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 3%
Other 20 7%
Unknown 115 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2016.
All research outputs
#18,471,305
of 22,888,307 outputs
Outputs from Odontology
#121
of 201 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#251,851
of 330,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Odontology
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,888,307 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 201 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,063 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.