↓ Skip to main content

Discriminant and Convergent Validity of the Anxiety Construct in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
Title
Discriminant and Convergent Validity of the Anxiety Construct in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, January 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10803-013-1767-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patricia Renno, Jeffrey J. Wood

Abstract

Despite reports of high anxiety in children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD), there is controversy regarding differential diagnosis of ASD symptoms and anxiety symptoms. This study examined 88 children, aged 7-11 years, with ASD referred for concerns about anxiety. A multitrait-(social anxiety, separation anxiety, overall anxiety severity, and overall ASD severity), multimethod-(diagnostic interviews, parent-, and child-based measures) analysis was conducted. Results from structural equation modeling suggest statistical discrimination between anxiety and ASD severity and convergence among differing reports of two of the anxiety subdomains (separation anxiety and overall anxiety). These findings suggest that anxiety symptoms experienced by children with ASD are separate from ASD symptom severity and may instead reflect anxiety syndromes (e.g., separation anxiety) similar to those that occur in typically developing children.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Spain 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 140 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 14%
Researcher 13 9%
Professor 7 5%
Other 27 19%
Unknown 25 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 73 50%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 5%
Social Sciences 7 5%
Computer Science 3 2%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 30 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2022.
All research outputs
#16,454,136
of 24,285,692 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#4,058
of 5,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,752
of 289,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#39
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,285,692 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,320 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,656 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.