↓ Skip to main content

Optimal HbA1c cutoff for detecting diabetic retinopathy

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Diabetologica, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
Title
Optimal HbA1c cutoff for detecting diabetic retinopathy
Published in
Acta Diabetologica, January 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00592-013-0452-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nam H. Cho, Tae Hyuk Kim, Se Joon Woo, Kyu Hyung Park, Soo Lim, Young Min Cho, Kyong Soo Park, Hak C. Jang, Sung Hee Choi

Abstract

The associations between high glucose levels and diabetic retinopathy have been the basis for the diagnosis of diabetes. We aimed to provide updated data on the relationship between HbA1c and diabetic retinopathy, and to assess the diagnostic accuracy of the proposed HbA1c cutoff for detecting diabetic retinopathy. This cross-sectional study included 3,403 adults from the 2009 to 2010 Ansung Cohort Study. Retinopathy was assessed with single-field nonmydriatic fundus photography and graded according to the International Clinical Diabetic Retinopathy Disease Severity Scale. HbA1c was measured by standardized assay using high performance liquid chromatography. Based on deciles distribution, the prevalence of retinopathy was very low until the HbA1c range of 48-51 mmol/mol (6.5-6.8 %). The optimal HbA1c cutoff for detecting any diabetic retinopathy was 49 mmol/mol (6.6 %), moderate or severer retinopathy was 52 mmol/mol (6.9 %) from receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. The proposed HbA1c threshold of 48 mmol/mol (6.5 %) from American Diabetes Association produced comparable accuracy for identifying both any and moderate/severer retinopathy. This study confirmed that the proposed HbA1c threshold of 48 mmol/mol (6.5 %) allowed the proper detection of diabetic retinopathy. Our data support the judicious use of HbA1c for the diagnosis of diabetes and detecting diabetic retinopathy as well.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 1%
Unknown 69 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 11 16%
Researcher 7 10%
Student > Master 7 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 16 23%
Unknown 18 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 51%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 20 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2019.
All research outputs
#6,387,185
of 22,694,633 outputs
Outputs from Acta Diabetologica
#203
of 885 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,685
of 280,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Diabetologica
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,694,633 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 885 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,879 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.