↓ Skip to main content

Heaven can wait. How religion modulates temporal discounting

Overview of attention for article published in Psychological Research, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
Title
Heaven can wait. How religion modulates temporal discounting
Published in
Psychological Research, January 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00426-012-0473-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fabio Paglieri, Anna M. Borghi, Lorenza S. Colzato, Bernhard Hommel, Claudia Scorolli

Abstract

Evidence suggests that religious systems have specific effects on attentional and action control processes. The present study investigated whether religions also modulate choices that involve higher-order knowledge and the delay of gratification in particular. We tested Dutch Calvinists, Italian Catholics, and Atheists from both countries/cultures using an intertemporal choice task where participants could choose between a small immediate and a larger delayed monetary reward. Based on the Calvinist theory of predestination and the Catholic concept of a cycle of sin-confession-expiation, we predicted a reduced delay tolerance, i.e., higher discount rate, for Italian Catholics than for Dutch Calvinists, and intermediate rates for the two atheist groups. Analyses of discount rates support our hypotheses. We also found a magnitude effect on temporal discounting and faster responses for large than for small rewards across religions and countries/cultures. We conclude that temporal discounting is specifically modulated by religious upbringing rather than by generic cultural differences.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 105 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 22%
Researcher 14 13%
Student > Master 14 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 12%
Professor 10 9%
Other 23 21%
Unknown 13 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 53 47%
Business, Management and Accounting 13 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 4%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 16 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2022.
All research outputs
#2,520,555
of 24,180,797 outputs
Outputs from Psychological Research
#93
of 1,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,968
of 288,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychological Research
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,180,797 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,001 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,222 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.