| Title |
MDMA use and neurocognition: a meta-analytic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Psychopharmacology, November 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00213-006-0601-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ari D. Kalechstein, Richard De La Garza, James J. Mahoney, William E. Fantegrossi, Thomas F. Newton |
| Abstract |
To determine the association between MDMA misuse and neurocognition using meta-analysis. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 83 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 17% |
| Researcher | 12 | 14% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 12 | 14% |
| Unknown | 14 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 25 | 28% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 14% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 14% |
| Unknown | 20 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2016.
All research outputs
#2,089,901
of 22,694,633 outputs
Outputs from Psychopharmacology
#515
of 5,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,239
of 69,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychopharmacology
#7
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,694,633 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,334 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,404 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.