↓ Skip to main content

Probing Quantum Violations of the Equivalence Principle

Overview of attention for article published in General Relativity and Gravitation, February 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Probing Quantum Violations of the Equivalence Principle
Published in
General Relativity and Gravitation, February 2001
DOI 10.1023/a:1002749217269
Authors

G. Z. Adunas, E. Rodriguez-Milla, D. V. Ahluwalia

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 8%
Unknown 11 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 4 33%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 25%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 7 58%
Psychology 1 8%
Philosophy 1 8%
Unknown 3 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2012.
All research outputs
#13,631,082
of 23,857,313 outputs
Outputs from General Relativity and Gravitation
#464
of 1,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,239
of 116,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age from General Relativity and Gravitation
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,857,313 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,448 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 116,670 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.