↓ Skip to main content

Competitive females are successful females; phenotype, mechanism, and selection in a common songbird

Overview of attention for article published in Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
100 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
Title
Competitive females are successful females; phenotype, mechanism, and selection in a common songbird
Published in
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, October 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00265-011-1272-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kristal E. Cain, Ellen D. Ketterson

Abstract

In a variety of taxa, male reproductive success is positively related to expression of costly traits such as large body size, ornaments, armaments, and aggression. These traits are thought to improve male competitive ability, and thus access to limited reproductive resources. Females of many species also express competitive traits. However, we know very little about the consequences of individual variation in competitive traits and the mechanisms that regulate their expression in females. Consequently, it is currently unclear whether females express competitive traits owing to direct selection or as an indirect result of selection on males. Here we examine females of a mildly dimorphic songbird (Junco hyemalis) to determine whether females, show positive covariance in traits (morphology and behavior) that may be important in a competition. We also examine whether trait expression relates either to testosterone (T) in terms of mechanism or to reproductive success in terms of function. We found that larger females were more aggressive and that greater ability to produce T in response to a physiological challenge consisting of a standardized injection of gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) predicted some measures of female body size and aggression. Finally, we found that aggressive females had greater reproductive success. We conclude that testosterone may influence female phenotype and that females may benefit from expressing a competitive phenotype. We also suggest that the mild dimorphism observed in many species may be due in part to direct selection on females rather than simply a correlated response to selection in males.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Spain 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 128 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 26%
Researcher 20 15%
Student > Master 20 15%
Student > Bachelor 17 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 16 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 90 68%
Environmental Science 9 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Psychology 2 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 <1%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 22 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2012.
All research outputs
#6,191,496
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
#1,031
of 3,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,397
of 141,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
#7
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,148 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 141,418 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.