Title |
Competitive females are successful females; phenotype, mechanism, and selection in a common songbird
|
---|---|
Published in |
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, October 2011
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00265-011-1272-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kristal E. Cain, Ellen D. Ketterson |
Abstract |
In a variety of taxa, male reproductive success is positively related to expression of costly traits such as large body size, ornaments, armaments, and aggression. These traits are thought to improve male competitive ability, and thus access to limited reproductive resources. Females of many species also express competitive traits. However, we know very little about the consequences of individual variation in competitive traits and the mechanisms that regulate their expression in females. Consequently, it is currently unclear whether females express competitive traits owing to direct selection or as an indirect result of selection on males. Here we examine females of a mildly dimorphic songbird (Junco hyemalis) to determine whether females, show positive covariance in traits (morphology and behavior) that may be important in a competition. We also examine whether trait expression relates either to testosterone (T) in terms of mechanism or to reproductive success in terms of function. We found that larger females were more aggressive and that greater ability to produce T in response to a physiological challenge consisting of a standardized injection of gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) predicted some measures of female body size and aggression. Finally, we found that aggressive females had greater reproductive success. We conclude that testosterone may influence female phenotype and that females may benefit from expressing a competitive phenotype. We also suggest that the mild dimorphism observed in many species may be due in part to direct selection on females rather than simply a correlated response to selection in males. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 2% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 128 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 26% |
Researcher | 20 | 15% |
Student > Master | 20 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 17 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 7% |
Other | 17 | 13% |
Unknown | 16 | 12% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 90 | 68% |
Environmental Science | 9 | 7% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
Psychology | 2 | 2% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | <1% |
Other | 5 | 4% |
Unknown | 22 | 17% |