You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Using N-of-1 Trials to Improve Patient Management and Save Costs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, April 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11606-010-1352-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paul A. Scuffham, Jane Nikles, Geoffrey K. Mitchell, Michael J. Yelland, Norma Vine, Christopher J. Poulos, Peter I. Pillans, Guy Bashford, Chris del Mar, Philip J. Schluter, Paul Glasziou |
| Abstract |
N-of-1 trials test treatment effectiveness within an individual patient. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 11% |
| India | 3 | 8% |
| Australia | 2 | 5% |
| Indonesia | 2 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 5% |
| Singapore | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Poland | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 19 | 51% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 34 | 92% |
| Scientists | 3 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Sri Lanka | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 173 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 13% |
| Researcher | 23 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 50 | 28% |
| Unknown | 35 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 62 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 7% |
| Psychology | 9 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 36 | 20% |
| Unknown | 43 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2022.
All research outputs
#912,868
of 24,766,831 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#754
of 8,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,706
of 99,881 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#5
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,766,831 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,005 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,881 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.