| Title |
Vitamin and mineral use and risk of prostate cancer: the case–control surveillance study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cancer Causes & Control, December 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10552-008-9282-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yuqing Zhang, Patricia Coogan, Julie R. Palmer, Brian L. Strom, Lynn Rosenberg |
| Abstract |
Many studies have evaluated the association between vitamin and mineral supplement use and the risk of prostate cancer, with inconclusive results. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 12% |
| Researcher | 4 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 12% |
| Unknown | 10 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 35% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 11 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2019.
All research outputs
#1,885,223
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Causes & Control
#201
of 2,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,014
of 172,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Causes & Control
#4
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,187 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,482 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.