↓ Skip to main content

Fragmented patterns of flood change across the United States

Overview of attention for article published in Geophysical Research Letters, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
39 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
133 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
164 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fragmented patterns of flood change across the United States
Published in
Geophysical Research Letters, October 2016
DOI 10.1002/2016gl070590
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. A. Archfield, R. M. Hirsch, A. Viglione, G. Blöschl

Abstract

Trends in the peak magnitude, frequency, duration, and volume of frequent floods (floods occurring at an average of two events per year relative to a base period) across the United States show large changes; however, few trends are found to be statistically significant. The multidimensional behavior of flood change across the United States can be described by four distinct groups, with streamgages experiencing (1) minimal change, (2) increasing frequency, (3) decreasing frequency, or (4) increases in all flood properties. Yet group membership shows only weak geographic cohesion. Lack of geographic cohesion is further demonstrated by weak correlations between the temporal patterns of flood change and large-scale climate indices. These findings reveal a complex, fragmented pattern of flood change that, therefore, clouds the ability to make meaningful generalizations about flood change across the United States.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 161 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 39 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 22%
Student > Master 14 9%
Other 11 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 23 14%
Unknown 31 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 39 24%
Environmental Science 38 23%
Engineering 25 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 1%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 46 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 119. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2022.
All research outputs
#340,885
of 24,945,754 outputs
Outputs from Geophysical Research Letters
#807
of 21,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,672
of 328,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geophysical Research Letters
#25
of 366 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,945,754 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,025 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,037 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 366 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.