↓ Skip to main content

The effect of hyperglycaemia on osseointegration: a review of animal models of diabetes mellitus and titanium implant placement

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Osteoporosis, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
Title
The effect of hyperglycaemia on osseointegration: a review of animal models of diabetes mellitus and titanium implant placement
Published in
Archives of Osteoporosis, September 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11657-016-0284-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shalinie King, Iven Klineberg, Itamar Levinger, Tara C. Brennan-Speranza

Abstract

Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus have a higher risk of dental and/or orthopaedic implant failure. However, the mechanism behind this phenomenon is unclear, and animal studies may prove useful in shedding light on the processes involved. This review considers the available literature on rat models of diabetes and titanium implantation. The process of osseointegration whereby direct contact is achieved between bone and an implant surface depends on healthy bone metabolism. Collective evidence suggests that hyperglycaemia adversely affects bone turnover and the quality of the organic matrix resulting in an overall deterioration in the quality, resilience and structure of the bone tissue. This in turn results in compromised osseointegration in patients receiving dental and orthopaedic implants. The incidence of diabetes mellitus (DM), which is a chronic metabolic disorder resulting in hyperglycaemia, is rising. Of particular significance is the rising incidence of adult onset type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in an ageing population. Understanding the effects of hyperglycaemia on osseointegration will enable clinicians to manage health outcomes for patients receiving implants. Much of our understanding of how hyperglycaemia affects osseointegration comes from animal studies. In this review, we critically analyse the current animal studies. Our review has found that most studies used a type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) rodent model and looked at a young male population of rodents. The pathophysiology of T1DM is however very different to that of T2DM and is not representative of T2DM, the incidence of which is rising in the ageing adult population. Genetically modified rats have been used to model T2DM, but none of these studies have included female rats and the metabolic changes in bone for some of these models used are not adequately characterized. Therefore, the review suggests that the study population needs to be broadened to include both T1DM and T2DM models, older rats as well as young rats, and importantly animals from both sexes to reflect more accurately clinical practice.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 74 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Student > Postgraduate 6 8%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 24 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 49%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 7%
Engineering 3 4%
Materials Science 3 4%
Psychology 2 3%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 22 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2016.
All research outputs
#20,341,859
of 22,888,307 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Osteoporosis
#499
of 640 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#256,343
of 294,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Osteoporosis
#10
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,888,307 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 640 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,932 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.