You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Methodological approaches for fractionation and speciation to estimate trace element bioavailability in engineered anaerobic digestion ecosystems: An overview
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Reviews in Environmental Science & Technology, September 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1080/10643389.2016.1235943 |
| Authors |
Eric D. van Hullebusch, Gilles Guibaud, Stéphane Simon, Markus Lenz, Sepehr Shakeri Yekta, Fernando G. Fermoso, Rohan Jain, Lars Duester, Jimmy Roussel, Emmanuel Guillon, Ulf Skyllberg, C. Marisa R. Almeida, Yoan Pechaud, Mirco Garuti, Luigi Frunzo, Giovanni Esposito, Cynthia Carliell-Marquet, Markus Ortner, Gavin Collins |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 2 | 29% |
| Portugal | 1 | 14% |
| Spain | 1 | 14% |
| France | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
| Scientists | 2 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 83 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Professor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 25 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 21 | 25% |
| Engineering | 10 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 5% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 33 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2016.
All research outputs
#7,061,138
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Environmental Science & Technology
#189
of 513 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,837
of 315,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Environmental Science & Technology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 513 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,315 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them