| Title |
Understanding the relationship between teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: a systematic review of qualitative evidence
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Educational technology research and development, September 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11423-016-9481-2 |
| Authors |
Jo Tondeur, Johan van Braak, Peggy A. Ertmer, Anne Ottenbreit-Leftwich |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium | 4 | 16% |
| United States | 3 | 12% |
| Saudi Arabia | 2 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 8% |
| Spain | 2 | 8% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 72% |
| Scientists | 7 | 28% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1094 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 173 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 145 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 144 | 13% |
| Lecturer | 82 | 7% |
| Researcher | 74 | 7% |
| Other | 184 | 17% |
| Unknown | 300 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 310 | 28% |
| Arts and Humanities | 111 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 67 | 6% |
| Psychology | 47 | 4% |
| Linguistics | 46 | 4% |
| Other | 160 | 15% |
| Unknown | 361 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2022.
All research outputs
#2,201,772
of 25,613,746 outputs
Outputs from Educational technology research and development
#54
of 1,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,599
of 331,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Educational technology research and development
#4
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,613,746 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,142 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,186 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.