↓ Skip to main content

The basic science of the subchondral bone

Overview of attention for article published in Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
476 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
453 Mendeley
Title
The basic science of the subchondral bone
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, January 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00167-010-1054-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Henning Madry, C. Niek van Dijk, Magdalena Mueller‐Gerbl

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 453 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 447 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 90 20%
Student > Master 69 15%
Student > Bachelor 49 11%
Researcher 41 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 29 6%
Other 78 17%
Unknown 97 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 124 27%
Engineering 73 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 6%
Materials Science 19 4%
Other 53 12%
Unknown 124 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2023.
All research outputs
#21,285,712
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#2,428
of 3,006 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,942
of 178,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#18
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,006 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,459 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.