↓ Skip to main content

Studying phenotypic evolution using multivariate quantitative genetics

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Ecology, March 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
136 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
313 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Studying phenotypic evolution using multivariate quantitative genetics
Published in
Molecular Ecology, March 2006
DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294x.2006.02809.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katrina McGuigan

Abstract

Quantitative genetics provides a powerful framework for studying phenotypic evolution and the evolution of adaptive genetic variation. Central to the approach is G, the matrix of additive genetic variances and covariances. G summarizes the genetic basis of the traits and can be used to predict the phenotypic response to multivariate selection or to drift. Recent analytical and computational advances have improved both the power and the accessibility of the necessary multivariate statistics. It is now possible to study the relationships between G and other evolutionary parameters, such as those describing the mutational input, the shape and orientation of the adaptive landscape, and the phenotypic divergence among populations. At the same time, we are moving towards a greater understanding of how the genetic variation summarized by G evolves. Computer simulations of the evolution of G, innovations in matrix comparison methods, and rapid development of powerful molecular genetic tools have all opened the way for dissecting the interaction between allelic variation and evolutionary process. Here I discuss some current uses of G, problems with the application of these approaches, and identify avenues for future research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 313 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
Brazil 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Finland 2 <1%
Argentina 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Other 5 2%
Unknown 287 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 92 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 73 23%
Professor > Associate Professor 30 10%
Student > Master 25 8%
Professor 24 8%
Other 54 17%
Unknown 15 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 232 74%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 6%
Environmental Science 16 5%
Social Sciences 6 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 2%
Other 13 4%
Unknown 21 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2023.
All research outputs
#2,268,242
of 23,415,749 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Ecology
#1,225
of 6,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,465
of 68,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Ecology
#1
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,415,749 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,430 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,480 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.