↓ Skip to main content

Distinct processes shape flashbulb and event memories

Overview of attention for article published in Memory & Cognition, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
Title
Distinct processes shape flashbulb and event memories
Published in
Memory & Cognition, November 2013
DOI 10.3758/s13421-013-0383-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carla Tinti, Susanna Schmidt, Silvia Testa, Linda J. Levine

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
France 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 83 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 18 20%
Researcher 15 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 14%
Student > Master 10 11%
Professor 7 8%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 14 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 47 53%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 5%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Neuroscience 3 3%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 17 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2017.
All research outputs
#14,861,191
of 22,888,307 outputs
Outputs from Memory & Cognition
#908
of 1,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,758
of 212,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Memory & Cognition
#11
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,888,307 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,575 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,638 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.