↓ Skip to main content

On the consistency of Borel's conjecture

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Mathematica, December 1976
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
166 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
On the consistency of Borel's conjecture
Published in
Acta Mathematica, December 1976
DOI 10.1007/bf02392416
Authors

Richard Laver

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Czechia 1 9%
Unknown 10 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 2 18%
Researcher 2 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 9%
Student > Postgraduate 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 7 64%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 9%
Unknown 3 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2017.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Acta Mathematica
#99
of 437 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,611
of 23,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Mathematica
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 437 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 23,468 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them