You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Analysis of the causes and effects of delay before diagnosis using surgical mortality data
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of Surgery, December 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1002/bjs.8986 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
J. B. North, F. J. Blackford, D. Wall, J. Allen, S. Faint, R. S. Ware, T. Rey‐Conde |
| Abstract |
The aim of the study was to assess the causes and effects of delay in diagnosis in surgical patients who died in 20 public hospitals participating in the Queensland Audit of Surgical Mortality (QASM) in Australia. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 46 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 9% |
| Researcher | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 19 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 46% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 21 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2013.
All research outputs
#15,262,171
of 22,694,633 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Surgery
#4,463
of 5,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,489
of 278,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Surgery
#35
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,694,633 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,230 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,010 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.