You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Starting from Hopelessness Sharing
|
---|---|
Published in |
TRENDS IN THE SCIENCES, January 2013
|
DOI | 10.5363/tits.18.5_59 |
Authors |
GOTO Hiroko |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 4 | 27% |
Unknown | 11 | 73% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 15 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2016.
All research outputs
#2,771,651
of 25,468,708 outputs
Outputs from TRENDS IN THE SCIENCES
#32
of 515 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,700
of 289,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age from TRENDS IN THE SCIENCES
#2
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,468,708 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 515 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,415 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.