↓ Skip to main content

多目的ダム開発と「揖斐谷」住民の変転(II)

Overview of attention for article published in JOURNAL OF WATER AND ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES, January 1997
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
多目的ダム開発と「揖斐谷」住民の変転(II)
Published in
JOURNAL OF WATER AND ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES, January 1997
DOI 10.6012/jwei.1997.60
Authors

木村 一夫

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2022.
All research outputs
#15,169,949
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from JOURNAL OF WATER AND ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES
#10
of 20 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,218
of 92,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JOURNAL OF WATER AND ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one scored the same or higher as 10 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,644 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them