You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Does supraspinatus initiate shoulder abduction?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Electromyography & Kinesiology, December 2012
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.jelekin.2012.11.008 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Darren Reed, Ian Cathers, Mark Halaki, Karen Ginn |
Abstract |
It is commonly stated that supraspinatus initiates abduction; however, there is no direct evidence to support this claim. Therefore, the aims of the present study were to determine whether supraspinatus initiates shoulder abduction by activating prior to movement and significantly earlier than other shoulder muscles and to determine if load or plane of movement influenced the recruitment timing of supraspinatus. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 125 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 31 | 25% |
United Kingdom | 19 | 15% |
United States | 7 | 6% |
Ireland | 5 | 4% |
Canada | 4 | 3% |
Japan | 3 | 2% |
Australia | 2 | 2% |
Chile | 2 | 2% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Other | 9 | 7% |
Unknown | 42 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 102 | 82% |
Scientists | 16 | 13% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 200 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Italy | 3 | 2% |
Japan | 2 | 1% |
Unknown | 195 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 44 | 22% |
Student > Bachelor | 27 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 11% |
Other | 13 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 6% |
Other | 38 | 19% |
Unknown | 44 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 65 | 33% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 33 | 17% |
Sports and Recreations | 30 | 15% |
Engineering | 9 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
Other | 9 | 5% |
Unknown | 51 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 101. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2022.
All research outputs
#417,766
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Electromyography & Kinesiology
#9
of 1,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,862
of 288,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Electromyography & Kinesiology
#1
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,132 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,755 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.