↓ Skip to main content

Anti-Listerial Effect of Selected Essential Oils and Thymol

Overview of attention for article published in Biologia Futura, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
Anti-Listerial Effect of Selected Essential Oils and Thymol
Published in
Biologia Futura, December 2016
DOI 10.1556/018.67.2016.3.10
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erika-Beáta Kerekes, Anita Vidács, Julianna Jenei Török, Csilla Gömöri, Tamás Petkovits, Muthusamy Chandrasekaran, Shine Kadaikunnan, Naiyf S. Alharbi, Csaba Vágvölgyi, Judit Krisch

Abstract

The anti-listerial effect of marjoram, thyme essential oils (EOs) and thymol on Listeria monocytogenes inoculated chicken breast fillets was investigated. Before inoculation the fillets were pretreated by washing or not under running tap water. Inoculated samples were kept at 6 °C for 24 h to allow the growth of L. monocytogenes. After this, the fillets were put in marinating solutions containing salt (5%) and EOs or thymol in MIC/2 concentration established in vitro. Total germ count (TGC) and L. monocytogenes count was monitored on the meat surface and in the marinating solutions following 24 and 48 h storage at 6 °C. Thyme and thymol reduced significantly Listeria cell count (1-3 log CFU) in both samples. They also gave good flavour to the fried meat. The doses of EOs used were optimal for antimicrobial efficiency and had a pleasant flavour effect. Washing was not efficient in reducing total germ count.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 20%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Lecturer 2 7%
Researcher 2 7%
Other 1 3%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 12 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Social Sciences 2 7%
Engineering 2 7%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 14 47%