You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparison of treatment effect sizes associated with surrogate and final patient relevant outcomes in randomised controlled trials: meta-epidemiological study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Medical Journal, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmj.f457 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Oriana Ciani, Marc Buyse, Ruth Garside, Toby Pavey, Ken Stein, Jonathan A C Sterne, Rod S Taylor |
| Abstract |
To quantify and compare the treatment effect and risk of bias of trials reporting biomarkers or intermediate outcomes (surrogate outcomes) versus trials using final patient relevant primary outcomes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 76 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 12 | 16% |
| United States | 8 | 11% |
| France | 5 | 7% |
| Sweden | 3 | 4% |
| Chile | 3 | 4% |
| Brazil | 3 | 4% |
| Canada | 3 | 4% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 3% |
| Colombia | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 28 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 50 | 66% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 14 | 18% |
| Scientists | 10 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 113 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 31 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 18% |
| Other | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 20 | 17% |
| Unknown | 16 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 70 | 58% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Mathematics | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Unknown | 22 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 74. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2022.
All research outputs
#587,839
of 25,593,129 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#6,599
of 64,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,408
of 291,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#45
of 785 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,593,129 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 64,828 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,764 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 785 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.