You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Medical and Sanitary Wastes on Tottori Beaches and the Dumping Ratio of Wastes in Japan
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the Japan Society of Material Cycles and Waste Management, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.3985/jjsmcwm.1130103 |
| Authors |
Tamon Okano, Motoki Yasumoto |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 63 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 18 | 29% |
| Comoros | 1 | 2% |
| Korea, Democratic People's Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 43 | 68% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 63 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2023.
All research outputs
#875,158
of 25,856,713 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Japan Society of Material Cycles and Waste Management
#2
of 17 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,644
of 291,325 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Japan Society of Material Cycles and Waste Management
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,856,713 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one scored the same or higher as 15 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,325 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them