| Title |
Pigeon and human performance in a multi-armed bandit task in response to changes in variable interval schedules
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Learning & Behavior, March 2011
|
| DOI | 10.3758/s13420-011-0025-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Deborah Racey, Michael E. Young, Dennis Garlick, Jennifer Ngoc-Minh Pham, Aaron P. Blaisdell |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 44 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 33% |
| Researcher | 8 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 19% |
| Unknown | 3 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 20 | 42% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 13% |
| Engineering | 4 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 15% |
| Unknown | 5 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2016.
All research outputs
#17,285,036
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Learning & Behavior
#404
of 904 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,522
of 120,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Learning & Behavior
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 904 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,034 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.