| Title |
Risk of Metachronous Colon Cancer Following Surgery for Rectal Cancer in Mismatch Repair Gene Mutation Carriers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Surgical Oncology, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1245/s10434-012-2858-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Aung Ko Win, Susan Parry, Bryan Parry, Matthew F. Kalady, Finlay A. Macrae, Dennis J. Ahnen, Graeme P. Young, Lara Lipton, Ingrid Winship, Alex Boussioutas, Joanne P. Young, Daniel D. Buchanan, Julie Arnold, Loïc Le Marchand, Polly A. Newcomb, Robert W. Haile, Noralane M. Lindor, Steven Gallinger, John L. Hopper, Mark A. Jenkins |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Romania | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 71 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 15% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 21 | 28% |
| Unknown | 12 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 43 | 58% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2014.
All research outputs
#16,443,300
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#4,852
of 7,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,231
of 293,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#33
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,471 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,947 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.